Delivery of Care

MOU signed with Medicare as part of dually eligible initiative

There is no apparent appetite to discern lessons learned from the launch of Rhody Health Options in 2013, without Medicare

Photo by Richard Asinof

The signature page of the 132-page MOU with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, signed on July 28, which finally brings Medicare in as a partner for a three-year test of Rhode Island's Integrated Care Initiative.

By Richard Asinof
Posted 8/3/15
The new MOU signed with Medicare as part of the Integrated Care Initiative moves the three-year test project forward in Rhode Island. But there does not appear to be any appetite by the R.I. General Assembly or those in state government to discern any lessons learned by the rollout of Rhody Health Options in 2013, its high cost, and its limited achievements.
Where do the savings go as part of risk-sharing contracts with the state? How much of those savings are actually channeled back to the providers on the front lines of care, how much goes to the insurers, and how much goes back into the state’s general fund? Is there a way to do research to calculate the actual costs of community-based alternatives to nursing homes for long-term care? What are the lessons that can be learned from the early launch of Rhody Health Options in 2013 without the participation of Medicare? Why is there no appetite to find out?
One of the known high-cost problems with patients in nursing homes is the protocol when a patient falls: the law requires that the patients be transported to an emergency room to be evaluated. The actual transport to the emergency room – and the experience once there – can be very anxiety provoking and disorienting for the patient, particularly for one who has dementia. A smarter, more cost-effective intervention might be to have a physician assistant or a nurse practitioner at the nursing facility perform the examination. That, of course, will put a dent into the revenue streams for ambulance services [which may charge up to $700 for such services], for emergency rooms, and for doctors. Under the new MOU with Medicare of the Integrated Care Initiatve, who will be responsible for implementing such practices?

PROVIDENCE – On July 28, Rhode Island became the last of 10 states entering into a capitated duals demonstration project as part of the federal Integrated Care Initiative nationwide to sign a memorandum of understanding with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 

The 132-page MOU details the conditions for a test of what was called a “capitated financial alignment model” in the delivery of services to dually eligible Rhode Islanders – residents who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid.

The MOU spells out in detail financial arrangements for the three-year test of the alignment, set to begin on Dec. 1, 2015, and run through Dec. 31, 2018.

The goal is to reduce the overall health costs driven by this population through better coordinated, better managed care.

The MOU sets the table, finally, for what was always envisioned as a three-legged stool: a contract between the state, CMS, and “one or more” Medicare-Medicaid managed care entities.

The problem has been, up until now in Rhode Island, that the alignment has been skewed: with only Medicaid, through the state, participating, with just one managed care entity, Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island, as the sole source contractor. Without the participation of Medicare and its financial resources, the realignment was much like a pinball machine that always registered tilt.

No accounting for the past
The state of Rhode Island chose to move ahead in 2013 with Rhody Health Options, a plan to bring managed care to Medicaid-covered seniors. Nearly all of these elderly Rhode Islanders had most of their health care services covered by Medicare; Medicaid paid the costs of their long-term care. Without the integration of Medicare, there was no way to coordinate primary, acute and long-term care. Rhody Health Options' added administrative costs were to be covered by the promise of moving some 6 percent of residents in nursing homes back into lower-cost community settings.

Those savings never materialized, and neither did the promised exodus of dually eligible long-term care patients in nursing homes.

At last count, as of May 2015, a total of just 53 dually eligible long-term care patients in nursing homes had been transitioned under Rhody Health Options during the last 18 months.

Few of these 53 transitions were done as a result of Neighborhood Health Plan’s managed care interventions, according to a number of nursing home advocates. They say that most would have happened absent any intervention by Neighborhood Health Plan, through an already exisitng program. Further, there were no metrics or measurements as to whether or not Neighborhood Health Plan had been able to prevent or delay the need for nursing home care among its long-term care enrollees residing in the community. 

In terms of managing the money in the contract between Neighborhood Health Plan and the R.I. Executive Office of Health and Human Services, the administrative part of the fees paid to Neighborhood Health Plan ran into the millions last year, for apparently very limited results.

The number-crunching performed under the auspices of the Working Group To Reinvent Medicaid did not delve too deeply into the ongoing financial imbalance at Rhody Health Options and its contract with Neighborhood Health Plan, as best as ConvergenceRI can determine.

For instance, under its risk-sharing agreement with the state, Neighborhood Health Plan claimed $9.5 million, to cover its losses in 2014.

At the center of the policy assumption in the working group’s proposed reinvention of Medicaid is that creating a community-based system of care instead of investing in long-term care in nursing facilities will create cost savings and improve care.

It is also a central component of the assumptions behind the Integrated Care Initiative and the realignment of Medicare and Medicaid spending on the dually eligible population.

But, what hasn’t been calculated yet is what the actual costs will be of creating a comprehensive community-based system of care. It may turn out, despite the best of intentions, to be a prohibitively expensive health care delivery system.

The biggest factor arguing against the success of the comprehensive community-based system of care – as currently defined in the Integrated Care Initiative – is Rhode Island’s demographics. As commentator Scott MacKay from Rhode Island Public Radio phrased it: “We have one of the highest populations of fragile elderly in the country. What’s happening is, folks have Alzheimer’s, they have dementia; it’s very expensive to care for these people. How do we deal with these kinds of illnesses that require institutionalization?”

Back to the future
Now that the MOU with Medicare has been signed, and with it, the third leg of the stool has been secured in the realignment of payments for dually eligible Rhode Islanders, many are optimistic about the opportunities to rebalance the system of care delivery.

It’s clear that no one in state government has any appetite to discern any lessons learned from the rollout of Rhody Health Options in 2013; the poor financial performance of the initiative will apparently be swept under the rug, with no accountability.

Under the new MOU, Medicare sets out some very detailed financial and quality metrics and standards to be achieved. These include reductions in payments to be achieved: 1 percent in the first year; 1.25 percent in the second year, and 3.3 percent in the third year.

Another fascinating part of the MOU is the language around contracting with “one or more” managed care providers. The language in the news release issued by CMS that announcing the new MOU was called “coy” by one local health care expert, as it related to future contracts with managed care providers.

The question is whether or not Neighborhood Health Plan will continue as a sole source provider under the new arrangement. CharterCARE’s parent, Prospect Medical, has indicated its interest in obtaining a share of the managed Medicaid population. Medicare is where the money is, when it comes to dollars spent on health care delivery for dually eligible persons.

© convergenceri.com | subscribe | contact us | report problem | About | Advertise

powered by creative circle media solutions

Join the conversation

Want to get ConvergenceRI
in your inbox every Monday?

Type of subscription (choose one):
Business
Individual

We will contact you with subscription details.

Thank you for subscribing!

We will contact you shortly with subscription details.