In Your Neighborhood

What does a doctor say to parents of a toddler who has been found with elevated levels of lead?

A guest column by Dr. Peter Simon

A study published in Pediatrics in May looked at the impact of elevated blood levels on reading readiness for Providence schoolchildren entering kindergarten.

Photo by Karen Jeffreys

Dr. Peter Simon, left, with Dr. Michael Fine, diector of the R.I. Department of Health, at the Childhood Lead Action Project 21st anniversary celebration on Oct. 10

By Dr. Peter Simon
Posted 10/14/13
The proliferation of elevated levels of lead in Rhode Island’s schoolchildren continues to be a man-made affliction that damages the future educational and economic potential of so many.
As Dr. Simon so poignantly writes about, the heart-breaking reality of lead poisoning requires more than effective laws for screening, for follow-up with a caring pediatrician, for education of parents, and for studies that document the pernicious way that elevated levels of lead in a child’s blood impact their reading readiness.
What will it take to spur better coverage of the human and economic costs done by lead to our schoolchildren? When will Rhode Island’s business leaders wake up and address the economic consequences on the state’s future workforce? What will spur the collaborative effort that needs to be undertaken by state educational officials?

It took more than two years for the problem of more than 200 deaths a year in Rhode Island by accidental overdoses from prescription painkillers to make it to the front pages, after my reporting on research conducted Traci Green was first brought to the attention of Dr. Michael Fine, director of the R.I. Department of Health. As a result, Fine changed the state’s public health priorities, and built a coalition of within state government – including the state police – to address the issue.
The high medical and economic cost of gun violence has begun to be documented in a new series in the Providence Journal. Why not a similar series on lead that makes the economic externalities part of the equation?

PROVIDENCE, May 15 – Last night, as has been my pattern since leaving my private practice to join the R.I. Department of Health in 1984, I went to the Providence Community Health Centers' Central Health Center on Cranston Street, in the West End of Providence, to see patients alongside Dr. Ellen Gurney and the rest of the Pediatric Team there.

Ellen has been a terrific partner for me, not only watching over my care of her practice’s patients and families, but as an instigator of my thinking about many maternal and child health initiatives over the years, most notably the Early Childhood Task Force in Providence in 1999.

On the Monday preceding this clinic, research coming out of the Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, conducted in collaboration with the R.I. Department of Health, the Providence Plan and the Providence Public Schools, was published by Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. [The study found that lead exposure contributes to decreased reading readiness at kindergarten entry.]

This research was the culmination of a local and national effort to advocate for what is called “healthy housing” to address social and environmental conditions that contribute to the disparities in health and education threatening the sustainability of our community.

The findings of the study led by Patricia McLaine, Ph.D., showed that blood lead levels as low as 2 micrograms per deciliter in children had a negative impact on measures of kindergarten readiness in a well-controlled regression model.

So, when Ellen asked me to see one of her patients and his parents about a recent blood lead test result of 5 micrograms per deciliter [the current standard of lead poisoning in children by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], I could tell she was doing it again – giving me a nudge towards an issue of hers that needed my thought and action.

So, feeling at the top of my game, I went in, followed by one of the pediatric nurses who usually was delegated the task of discussing blood lead results with parents.

In the examination room with his parents was a handsome 22-month-old little boy who was busy exploring the exam table, using lots of language that his mom clearly understood, but that challenged the rest of us, including dad, to understand.

As I usually do, I asked dad and mom why they had come that evening. They told me they had received a letter from the R.I. Department of Health telling them that their child’s blood test had shown an elevated level of lead, and that they should make an appointment with their primary care provider to discuss next steps.

I skipped over the fact that the letter was signed by yours truly and went directly to the facts about what a result of 5 micrograms per deciliter means.

With every skill I possess in health communication, I walked a tight rope, trying to balance the responsibility to fully disclose the nature of all the effects of lead on a child’s brain while at the same time knowing how limited I was in predicting the outcomes for one child.

My goal was to help these parents protect their child’s brain and, at the same time, help maintain their self-confidence. I was trained to worry about the risk of creating a “vulnerable child.”

I pointed out the healthy nature of their child’s present behavior and development that we all could see from the small sample of time we were together, watching the toddler explore the room, engaging in a social interaction with the pediatric nurse who he had approached immediately when she entered.

I tried to emphasize what kind of experiences could enrich the child’s brain development and found myself recommending the things I have always done for every child and family over the last 35 years.

Talk, sing and read to your child; take them places like parks, grocery shopping, to the library. Play games with them and show them the things that you love to do. Learn as much as you can about what to expect from them at each stage of growth so that you do not interfere with their trying new things. Insert yourself when necessary to protect them from the hazards you can see that they cannot. Be ready to let them go to reach the goals we all want for our children: independence, self-direction and activation.

I then described ways to reduce exposure to lead-contaminated dust and dirt by wet mopping and wiping surfaces of toys and any other objects that toddlers mouth as a routine, recommended some nutritional guidance, and offered to prescribe some vitamin and iron supplementation to be added to his orange juice at breakfast, and scheduled another lead test for a month later.

The parents had no questions, so I said good-bye. I will not be seeing them again, so it won’t be possible for me to answer the questions that sit burning in my mind: how will this youngster do when he goes to kindergarten. Will he succeed in his educational career? Will his lead exposure be overcome? Will his teachers know how to help him learn to read?

Dr. Peter Simon is the medical director of the Division of Community, Family Health, and Equity at the R.I. Department of Health. He was recognized as a national Public Health Hero in 2012, and he received a 2013 Community Hero Award from the Childhood Lead Action Project.


No comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

© | subscribe | contact us | report problem | About | Advertise

powered by creative circle media solutions

Join the conversation

Want to get ConvergenceRI
in your inbox every Monday?

Type of subscription (choose one):

We will contact you with subscription details.

Thank you for subscribing!

We will contact you shortly with subscription details.