Delivery of Care

In health care, follow the money

A history lesson provided Dr. Peter Simon about the importance of asking the right questions

ConvergenceRI file photo

Dr. Peter Simon at the 2015 Health Equity Summit

By Dr. Peter Simon
Posted 1/18/21
For all the hard work being done by employees at the health care systems in Rhode Island – the doctors, the nurses, the technicians, and the aides, the decision-making around how the money gets spent and why is often an opaque territory, where return on investment and good health outcomes are not connected. As Dr. Peter Simon argues, there is always a need to follow the money if there is to be greater accountability around improved health outcomes.
What hospitals would be willing to invest in the development of affordable housing on their campuses as a way to put their money not into the bond market or the stock exchanges but in desperately needed new affordable housing development Rhode Island needs, with the ability to earn a similar rate of return on investment? When will commercial insurers consider ending their dependence on third-party authorization firms for medical procedures? What are the causes as to why prescription drugs are the leading cause of higher medical costs for both commercial and managed care health insurers? When will the R.I. Attorney General’s office investigate the continuing low insurance reimbursement rates for mental health and behavioral health services in Rhode Island?
One of the relationships many in the news media seem unwilling to examine is the differential way they treat elected and corporate officials who provide regular access to them – until, of course, that access is no longer available.
For six years, the Raimondo administration has proven to be adept in granting access to a select group of journalists, offering them one-on-one interviews with the Governor, and scheduling private “unscheduled” briefings with small groups of select journalists – in advance of public briefings.
Many never really questioned the basis of their “entitled” relationship – until, of course, the Governor stopped answering their questions, and the “cozy” relationship disappeared. Instead, many saw themselves as “heroic” figures asking questions in the pursuit of truth, justice and higher ratings, now denied their rightful access.
All of a sudden, after six years of quiescence, the Rhode Island Press Association issued a statement questioning the Governor’s refusal to answer questions. One TV news anchor bemoaned the lack of access to the Governor on Twitter. It seems the privileged information pipeline they had depended upon has been shut down. Boo hoo.
For some reason, many of the journalists never saw themselves as willing participants in being co-opted, in being engaged in a harmful co-dependent relationship – or in being willing collaborators in serving as mouthpieces the Governor and her messaging.
And, many never rose in defense of other journalists, such as ConvergenceRI, or ecoRI, who had been cut out of the process. Somehow, we still managed to cover the news without selling our souls.

PROVIDENCE – It is almost always about money. Whether the subject is defense spending, food policy, road building, and yes, education, what I have learned over the years is that to understand the politics, you need to follow the money.

How did I learn this, other than reading books like Confessions of an Economic Hitman? I listened to stories told by my mentors in Social Medicine, and I observed how health policies were designed to limit the power of government oversight of insurance companies and hospitals.

As Will Rogers used to say, nothing teaches us quite as well as seeing it up front, close and personal.

The color of money
Two events have shaped my attitude about the importance of following the money.

Understanding what is happening in our health care delivery “system” – what some have called a “wealth extraction process” – is not easy, looking in from the outside.

My first lesson about health care financing happened in the late 1970s. I was working in the Division of Epidemiology as a rookie medical epidemiologist, supervised by a career epidemiologist assigned to Rhode Island by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC].

We had just received one of the first federal grants to establish a Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program in the nation. Dr. Faich asked me to serve as the medical director for the Program; one of my first tasks was to review the performance of the clinical team following cases of lead poisoning that would be our official “go to” medical home for these children and families.

It made sense to continue to work with the team at Rhode Island Hospital, led by Dr. Jeff Brown, MD, and Lois Brown, RN, who had started screening and treatment in the late 1960s.

My review of their performance confirmed that impression. I had finished my pediatric training at Rhode Island Hospital and knew most of the staff in the Ambulatory Section of the Department of Pediatrics, directed at the time by Dr. John O’Shea, MD.

After reviewing a dozen or so records, I was impressed that the care was comprehensive, culturally competent and well coordinated with the staff of the R.I. Department of Health, which was doing inspections and enforcement of lead hazard reduction practices and interventions.

Over the first few years of the program, screening volume grew in other clinical settings as well through outreach into high-prevalence neighborhoods during the summer months, using trained college-age screeners to collect finger stick specimens, going door-to-door in neighborhoods with loads of old housing in poor condition.

The population referred to the clinic at Rhode Island Hospital grew substantially. Program staff participated in the clinic to assure that referrals were completed and the information needed for our lead hazard assessment to be scheduled could be captured.

Too much volume
About a year after being awarded the grant from the Center for Environmental Health at CDC, I got a call from Dr. O’Shea that there was a problem he needed to discuss with me. That afternoon, I showed up at his office, where he told me that the Chief Financial Officer of Rhode Island Hospital was not happy about the mounting losses that the hospital was taking by operating the Lead Poisoning clinic.

I was a bit unsure at the time about the number of children who were uninsured, so I asked for a bit of time to review our records. The next day, I reviewed all the files for children being followed by the clinic and confirmed that they were entirely insured, mostly by the Medicaid program. I shared this with Dr. O’Shea and suggested that we sit down with someone from the Finance Office to see how it could be that the hospital was losing money when there were no uninsured patients.

I heard nothing for two weeks. Dr. O’Shea’s secretary called, finally, with a date and time to meet with the finance folks. At that meeting, a very junior person reported again that the clinic would have to be discontinued because of losses incurred. I asked how it could be that a hospital could be losing money taking care of children insured primarily by Medicaid, since I knew that the law gave cost-based reimbursement to hospital providers. I got no answer.

After failing to get any concessions from the hospital, there was nothing left to do but find another place to hold a clinic for treating lead-poisoned children identified through our screening program.

Luckily, St. Joseph Hospital was willing to adopt the clinic and Dr. Brown was able to go along with the children to continue to follow and treat them.

About a month after the clinic at St. Joe’s had started to operate, I ran into the Chief of Pediatrics at Rhode Island Hospital at a reception for the newly arrived President of Brown University. The Chief saw me entering the home used to house the President and called me over. Our families had become friendly, so I knew him better than most young pediatricians in Rhode Island.

Before I could say “hello,” he angrily said to me: “Peter, if the Lead Clinic is not returned to Rhode Island Hospital, I will embarrass you publicly.”

It took me a second to respond by asking him if Dr. O’Shea had shared with him how the clinic had been forced to leave by leadership of the hospital. He said nothing, and I turned and walked away.

Lesson Two
Lesson Two occurred 35 years later. I was asked by the Director of the R.I. Department of Health to attend a meeting between the department and the TB Clinic run by the Department of Infectious Diseases at the Miriam Hospital.

The TB Clinic was not a responsibility of my Division, but I did what I was asked. The meeting was held in the conference room outside the door of the Director of Health. There were staff from our Division of Disease Control and staff from the Miriam Hospital, along with the president of the hospital.

I listened but said nothing. It was a deja vu feeling that came over me as I heard the Miriam staff talk about the financial losses to the hospital. Our Division of Disease Control had a small contract with the Clinic, but it fell short of making up their “losses.”

Finally, after a little discussion about volume of cases and services that were responsible for their losses, they turned to me and asked if I had anything to share. I asked one question: Were any of them present when the reimbursement rates for the clinic were negotiated with the payers?

The answer was: no. I then asked what they had done internally at the hospital to meet with their payers to show them the losses from rates that were set too low. Same response: nope.

Moral of the history lessons
I never heard anything about how the issue was resolved, other to ask whether the contract with the TB clinic had been renegotiated. It had not.

So, what explains their practice of negotiating reimbursement rates inadequate to meet their costs, you ask? The answer is complicated and I hesitate to tell you my conclusion: but since hospitals often use losses to help them with fundraising, I will leave you to ponder further.

Dr. Peter Simon, MD, a retired pediatrician and epidemiologist, is a frequent contributor to ConvergenceRI.


No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

© | subscribe | contact us | report problem | About | Advertise

powered by creative circle media solutions

Join the conversation

Want to get ConvergenceRI
in your inbox every Monday?

Type of subscription (choose one):

We will contact you with subscription details.

Thank you for subscribing!

We will contact you shortly with subscription details.